Right off the bat you have a chronocentric perspective. Our progress is not universal, it just appears that way to us Westeners because we're marinated in it. Actually it is specific in both time and space.
Even within our countries there are huge portions of the population, especially outside the cities, for whom there has been little progress for considerable time. There has been regression. That's a large part of why Trump got elected. Have you a single article on any of this?
Furthermore you Katie, are not a skeptic of Silicon Valley. Peter Thiel, whom you abhor and call names in this article, is. So is Nicholas Carr and Jaron Lanier.
> At Gizmodo, the answer is this: We approach technology with both enthusiasm and scrutiny, covering the Silicon Valley elite with the skepticism and rigor that their billions of dollars and vast influence deserve.
You don't attack Silicon Valley, you just attack the personalities within it. It's like thinking the point of Christmas is fairy lights. If only we could arrange them properly with the right lighting configuration Christmas would be improved. No!
SV does need skeptics from the left and the right. It does not need a constant stream of whining about who is dicking who and how many women Elon Musk follows on Twitter. I checked your website. You don't have a single article on Gwynne Shotwell, who not only has an awesome name for a rocket company president but is running the show at one of the most important technology companies on (and off) the planet.