> They're ignorant, sure, but it's hard to see things
> from another perspective if you've never really been
> exposed to anything else.
Could they not be intelligent, rational individuals with the personal agency to have looked at the same facts as you and come up with different conclusions?
Things intelligent, well-read people can disagree on: fiscal policy; democracy versus republic; abortion rights; single-payer healthcare.
Things so overwhelmingly shown to be factually true that it's not a sign of reasonableness to debate them: Earth and life are old; vaccines don't cause autism.
No. Just as someone that says 2 + 2 = 457 is also wrong.