Of all the invectives to level at Rust, "toxic development community" would be the least applicable. Frankly, I've found the Rust community super welcoming and willing to answer questions from a newbie.

As for the rest of your points - I don't think they're applicable as well. I've found Rust to be super solid and the ecosystem a pleasure to work with. Could you give examples to support your claim?

A lot of your attacks seemed to be aimed at personal beliefs of some of the rust developers. I follow some on twitter and they may have some views people disagree with, but nothing exceedingly controversial.

Furthermore, all other criticisms you've mentioned specifically towards rust and the community of rust are literal opposites of everything I've experienced.

The community is friendly and helpful. Rust is extremely stable, both as code, and as far as the developers making sure to not break backwards compatibility, going as far as testing EVERY PROJECT available in crates.io for regressions. They are also extremely organized, having all discussions in well thought out and documented RFCs,and allowing all to give input on it all.

I don't know what problems you have with Rust. I'm sure there valid things to critize. But everything you mentioned is categorically false. If you disagree, I'd be open to see proof of it all.

Huh? Did you mix it up with something else? Rust community is one of the best. And what's "dangerous and unstable" there?

I've had nothing but amazing experiences in the Rust community, and was actually proud/embarrassed the one time that I was chastised for being rude in /r/rust.

The Rust community reminds me of how welcoming the Go community used to be... (I love Go and write it every day, this isn't some sort of commentary about Go).

Toxic?