This also gets to something I've never understood: why global warming is political. The science is objectively solid and the economic costs of not doing something are clear. I'll argue about the benefit and drawbacks of policies to address it all day long, but how is outright denial a thing?
1 in 3 voted Republican, are they going to be thrown to the wolves because of the other 2 ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_ele...
I know Chris Christie is implicated in blocking traffic in New Jersey, but punishing a state is a whole different league.
If one party has no realistic way of reaching that 50% margin, then any concessions they offer would be useless as far as getting their candidate into the presidency.
(Drawing voting districts to make them advantageous to one party or the other depending on who gets to draw the lines)
We really need to move to popular vote instead of all these games.
If conservatives are this blithe about inflicting hardship against their fellow Americans, then they are traitors.
(I'm a conservative, BTW. Fuck this whole year, with a chainsaw. I'm supporting liberals because my views are being represented by utter scumbags.)
California should get by far the biggest say in everything because of this. Divide the electoral collage up by GDP instead of population and see what the colors look like.