It cites real data from a real scientist. I disagree with the conclusion and the premise just like you do, but it's absolutely not "fake news".
>The professor's finding are a very small, small part of the overall article, and certainly a very small part of their overall narrative.
You could say this for a ton of MSNBC and Fox News articles. Should they also be banned as fake news?
People in this thread generally aren't saying Breitbart should be considered a reputable source for anything; in fact I'd bet most of the Breitbart defenders in here are leftists or at least not far-right like Breitbart. I'm saying there shouldn't be calls for it to be censored in any way. Censorship is extremely dangerous; far, far more dangerous than Breitbart publishing their silly headlines.