Hacker News Reader

Comment by redthrowaway | Hacker News Reader

There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever of any hacking. Period. There is no reason to believe it occurred. This is just leftists grieving about losing the election, and refusing to admit they nominated a terrible candidate and adopted a platform that is actively repellant to voters in states they needed to win.

By all means, the IC should be double-checking to ensure the vote was legitimate. But the left needs to accept that it was and move past the insane conspiracy theory stage of the grieving process.

View on HN

I hope this will be taken as non-partisan, but, at least from the perspective of the UK, Trump was the one saying "the election is rigged". Was that reported in the US?

Yes, only Trump said it and many outside his world strongly rejected it.

He was, when he thought he would lose. It's just as bad for the left to make those claims now as it was for him to make them then. Attacking the legitimacy of elections without evidence is bad, full stop.

The author of the article agrees: He says it's unlikely and wants to check the evidence.

Yes, and back when Trump was one saying it, it was treated not just as a conspiracy theory but as a dangerous attack on democracy itself. Both social media and the press were insistent that this was ridiculous and impossible.

The vote counts are off in many counties, including having more votes in a county than registered voters.

It's not evidence of hacking, but it's evidence that the vote tallies are wrong. At a minimum a recount and analysis should be done to determine root cause of why the numbers are wrong.

>The vote counts are off in many counties, including having more votes in a county than registered voters.

This is simply not true.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/demographics-not-hacking...

http://www.snopes.com/audit-the-vote/

Thanks for the corrections! I hadn't personally verified this stuff, and will certainly stop repeating it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com