AmigaOS 4.1 Final Edition Update 1 – Pre-Release for the AmigaOne X5000
hyperion-entertainment.com
hyperion-entertainment.com
Are there any sales figures available for that machine? I'd love to know how many people are still buying "Amigas".
(Also worth noting, the X1000 had a dual-core CPU, but AmigaOS can only use one core. RISC OS (the ex-Acorn OS) has a similar problem when running on later Raspberry Pi devices.)
The old machines are still back home in Europe.
"As I replied in another interview recently, we have sold in excess of 200 AmigaOne X1000 systems and boards but less than 2000. As for satisfaction, yes we were very pleased with AmigaONE X1000 sales but, due to the high cost and shortage of P.A. Semi CPUs, we took the decision to discontinue manufacturing the Nemo motherboard." (June 2015)
Note that this is not the only AmigaOne's on sale. There are also the ACube SAM boards/computers [2], which are substantially cheaper. They don't really directly compete due to the price gap - in fact, A-Eon apparently contracts ACube for some work (firmware etc.).
Estimating the yearly sales of AmigaOS 4.x machines is thus quite hard, but I'm assuming it's in the low hundreds per year at most.
[1] http://distrita.com/a-eon-interview-about-amigas-future/
[2] http://www.acube-systems.biz/index.php?page=hardware&pid=7
Yet the speed of it puts other OSes on the device to shame.
How many years left till these vultures stop picking the bones of the Amiga community...
Those that can't afford these have plenty of cheaper alternatives to choose from, ranging from AROS on a wide range of platforms, to classic AmigaOS or AROS in emulators, MorphOS on old Macs, classic AmigaOS on upgraded classics or FPGA reimplementations, to SAM AmigaOne boards from ACube.
It is. Especially considering that other m68k systems are sold for much less, such as this one which is an Atari-compatible computer and is sold for 643 Euros (560 for the motherboard and 83 for the case): http://firebee.org/fb-bin/index
But it is kind of a different sort of thing. I think the AmigaOne is a foolish concept, but it is a far more powerful machine than the FireBee, as it is based around a high speed PowerPC board.
PowerPC IMHO is a dead-end, but it seems like many in the Amiga community have tried to hitch their wagon to it. They'd be better off porting to ARM (running in big-endian mode I guess) if the OS is really worth it.
Nothing practical. I will probably try to do some dev work on it to improve it. Dabble in some VHDL and OS work for it.
Dave Haynie and a couple of others were asked to help design a new platform around Power as Amiga was dated. Escom had money issues almost immediately (of course) so it never happened and Escom went bust within a year.
Commodore UK's bid was planning HP RISC.
The only problem with PPC from an Amiga point of view is that most of the SOCs are targetting networking and automotive markets and similar embedded use rather than desktops (total PPC sales in terms of number of chips is still in a similar region to x86 sales; revenue per unit is way lower, though). It's not like people will buy these machines looking for top end performance, and the OS is still incredibly light weight, but if you pay for it you can still get PPC chips that perform very well.
But AmigaOne's are an very expensive hobby for most people who buy them, not bought to be cost effective.
More comparable to the FireBee you have a multitude of M68k accelerators and FPGA Amiga reimplementations that are much cheaper.
There's been various discussions about trying to run AmigaOS or AROS on ColdFire like the FireBee too. Problem is people would expect to run their old binary-only software, and AFAIK the ColdFire can't trap all the unimplemented instruction combinations fully, so it'd require "fun" hacks (e.g. dynamic translation; I think it probably could be done reasonably easily for AmigaOS, but finding someone with both the time and the skills is another matter) so the Amiga community focus has been on FPGAs.
The FireBee is a neat hack I don't mind supporting, but if people really want hardware and emulators don't cut it, then FPGA is probably the way to go.
Or switch architectures and port the OS (EmuTOS and/or AROS) + some sort of CPU translation/emulation layer for 68k stuff. It would probably have to be something big endian, so that rules out RISC-V but OpenRISC, J2 (SuperH) and OpenSPARC are some open source candidates.
So basically the Firebee (Atari compatible) is an m68k board, while most "modern" systems for Amiga OS are currently PowerPC, NOT m68k as I erroneously implied in my previous comment.
BTW today I've been googling a bit and it seems that the SAM boards by ACube Systems are substantially cheaper than the X5000, so they could be a valid alternative for people on a budget wanting to run Amiga OS: https://acube-systemsbiz.serversicuro.it/shop/en/5-sam-mothe...
I got mine for $80 (they sell for very cheap without the gamepad).
Considering it has been almost fully hacked, I think it's a good candidate for a cheap AmigaOS platform.