Sean Parker: Facebook Should Not Have Won, MySpace Blew It
fastcompany.com
fastcompany.com
Myspace was basically just a simple webpage maker that let you "friend" other "webpages".
Facebook was an actual social network where you could find people.
With myspace if you didn't know someone's myspace account, you couldn't find them. With facebook, all you needed to have was either your high school name, college class, or your past employer, and you could connect/reconnect with people.
And not building in simple search (rather than trying too hard to monetize through Google) would constitute blowing it.
I think all of the customization started from them just not sanitizing input. People realized they could customize their page, inject javascript, etc and then that just became an expect part of MySpace. If they removed that now there would probably be little reason for many of the users still there to stay.
There are a million ways they could have used their position to crush Facebook, but they (a) didn't have a strong engineering culture and (b) were focused strongly on revenue over growth and product.
I remember a "joking" quote from a MySpace exec where he said they don't mind error pages, because it gives them the chance to serve more ad impressions!
No intelligent person I know would want to work at MySpace, while Facebook successfully overcame its early stigma as a "toy website" and is now one of the best places for engineers in Silicon Valley.
MySpace's stupid product decisions were a consequence of these underlying problems.