I don't see any sources linked in the article, nor any quotes from any officials or excerts from any documents. Not saying this article is bunk, but what's the foundation for these claims?
https://openmedia.org/en/bill-c-51-just-passed-where-do-we-g... http://www.tomshardware.com/news/snoopers-charter-passes-uk-... http://motherboard.vice.com/read/yahoo-government-email-scan... http://www.tomshardware.com/news/e2ee-yahoo-mail-hack-spying... http://www.tomshardware.com/news/burr-feinstein-anti-encrypt...
And this was the link at the bottom of the article that was actually being discussed. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cnslttns/ntnl-scrt/thm09-...
Did you read any of them? Your comment seems disingenuous, at best