I think using a friendlier distro like Ubuntu or Fedora would probably be a lot better and give a much better experience.
I think using a friendlier distro like Ubuntu or Fedora would probably be a lot better and give a much better experience.
- had to buy a 2nd GPU to get 3 monitors to work
- GPU driver won't drive my 2560x1440 monitor at the max res
- popup volume control pops up every minute or so (and sound pops and stutters a bit each time this happens)
- when waking from sleep, TTY works immediately, but GUI takes about 30 seconds to appear
- something crashes on every boot, but it doesn't tell me what (I dutifully submit a crash report)
- any time I drag something in Firefox (text, image, tab, etc.), Firefox crashes
USB throughput and FS performance are very good though, and 3d, wifi and suspend-to-disk do work!
(Whatever the root cause of all of these things, be it Linux per se or some other issue, the fact remains that I don't have any of these problems on Windows. Of course, I don't get the smashing filing system speed either...)
Whether it's worth the trouble of tracking down arcane options to get your system working optimally is up to you. For most people it's not worth the effort, so there are relatively few of us running Linux on the desktop. If you're willing to put in the time and effort (and you happen to have compatible hardware) it is possible to get a system that matches or exceeds proprietary software desktops. Just be prepared to start all over again when you upgrade to the next version of Ubuntu.
We have to check MacOS and Windows compatibility only if we do strange things, like hackintoshes or installing Windows from scratch on a different generation computer. I must admit that installing desktop Linux is always a strange thing, because very few manufacturers care of testing any distro on their hw. Quite the opposite for server Linux.
Might be a lower refresh rate (49.9 v 59.9) will behave.
Likely pulseaudio shit itself and got restarted by systemd...