Small Businesses Doing Well Building and Maintaining Backyard “Microfarms”
latimes.com
latimes.com
I hope this is a trend that continues for lots of families, actually.
On an unrelated note, I got a kick out of seeing that his revenues jumped "to $54,000" last year. That was my business's second-year gross, and I didn't think it was all that noteworthy.
This year should be a lot better, but the deer haven't re-discovered me yet, so we'll see.
I don't really optimize for yield though; there are a bunch of neat things that can be done for that, and I'm partly doing this just because I like playing in the dirt when I'm stuck on the phone.
I like earth boxes: water goes in the bottom, roots get watered, minimizes evaporation so they are very water efficient.
The cost saving argument is probably a stretch: "In many cases, installing a Farmscape garden in the place of an existing lawn can lower your monthly yard maintenance and irrigation expenses. Depending on crop selection, most customers can expect to break even against the installation cost of the garden with the savings over organic grocery or farmers market purchases and the gas and time for the errands. This also depends heavily on how you value high quality fresh-picked produce and how you value your own time spent inspecting fruits and vegetables in the produce aisle."
But as another commenter points out, this is more about keeping up with the Jones than saving money. There's a chicness in CA these days in having a bountiful garden (chickens provide an extra level chicness in some places). And whereas the DIYers have set the trend and have embraced the dirt and sweat of the enterprise (see http://www.amazon.com/Farm-City-Education-Urban-Farmer/dp/15...), the green-leaning elite are willing to buy their way to the promised land. Another version of the same old story, no?
In terms of urban harvest, I think this is way cooler, although who knows if it's successful from an environmental-economics standpoint: http://nymag.com/guides/summer/2009/57477/
(a) as human-vs-nature struggles go, playing at subsistence agriculture might be less arduous than trying to imitate a British lawn in the Southern California desert climate
(b) the people in Farmscape’s target market are probably people who would otherwise be hiring a gardener to maintain their lawns
My wife and I have a small ranch near College Station Texas (home of Texas A&M University) where we raise a herd of Texas Longhorn steers, for natural lean beef as well as their beauty. I can't tell you how relaxing it is to walk through the pasture at the end of the day. It's not only relaxing, but a great opportunity to get more "think time".
Assume that in the long run, rising oil prices and what-not are going to make food more expensive and, in general, degrade your standard of living.
Then it makes a certain amount of sense to get in on the backyard-gardening thing now and invest the necessary money and effort into improving your soil, figuring out what kinds of plants work there and what doesn’t work, etc., so that you actually have something useful by the time the Apocalypse hits.
It makes not quite so much sense to hire someone else to do all this work for you, but, well, if your gardener moves to Oregon to escape the Apocalypse maybe he’ll at least leave you all his notes.
Of course, if I were thinking about the Apocalypse, I wouldn’t want to live in a part of the continent whose residents depended on faraway sources for fresh water. So maybe we’re back to the snobbery explanation. Or maybe I, as a New Englander, am just more of a snob than all the Californians.
"[She] lived in the kind of poverty that was only available to the very rich, a poverty approached from the other side."
-- Terry Pratchett, in "Men at Arms"People who can spend $1675 a year on having someone else grow their produce for them are probably a lot less likely to have been affected by the recession.
Large planters, raised beds and strategically located pots seem to me preferable to hiring someone to come "tend the lower 400 sq. ft."