However, some research has been coming out lately that suggests diet soda (more specifically artificial sweeteners) may have various negative effects on health. Nothing conclusive but enough to make me avoid artificial sweeteners entirely.
The phosphoric acid is the problem - the cola drinks contain a large amount.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892765/
While there's no conclusive proof diet soda definitely causes weight gain, there's absolutely no evidence at all that it helps with weight loss.
Sugary or not, there's no rational basis for considering sodas of any variety "healthy."
Diet soda makes you hungrier, and that makes you eat more and gain weight.
As an aside, I have a hypothesis that naturally focusing on proximate vs. root causes is actually a big contributor to the divide between major segments of the population.
I didn't claim this. "Healthy" food is a subjective term, and to most people does not mean "something that makes you loose weight". Compared to non-diet pop, it is a healthy alternative.
If you're trying to loose weight, stick with water. If you are managing your weight fine and enjoy pop, diet is better than non-diet. The studies you linked to support this.
You mean like the fact that they inhibit beneficial intestinal flora [1], or that numerous studies have found that people have a higher risk for diabetes if they drink diet soda [2], or that people gain weight when they switch to diet sofa from regular [3]?
Yeah, those wacky skeptics - they'll believe anything...
[1] http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/10.1139/apnm-2016-0346#....
[2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23364017/
[3] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal....
What is known is that suddenly cutting caffeine after large regular intake will cause weight gain.
https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/enhanced/web...
Number 2: major confounder is that people who eat unhealthy or are already obese drink those diet drinks. People who aren't drink normal ones. Needs interventional study not dumb epidemiology.
Number 3: see number 2.