Why on Earth has humanism fallen into disrepute among literary studies majors?
Why on Earth has humanism fallen into disrepute among literary studies majors?
yes, it's commonly said, and it's politically supported as well with all the emphasis on promoting STEM subjects.
however...vocation and $dayjob are not the same thing and the conflation of them is, I think, one of the roots of a profound cultural problem we're currently facing.
I don't mean merely to argue the semantics of the word "vocation", which I know is frequently used as a reference to "vocational training" which is an unfortunately named term that refers to practical job skills training.
I'm arguing that the reason we make this mistake of semantics in the first place is because on a deeper level our culture has lost touch with the notion of what a vocation really is and really means. It means _calling_. Education really _should_ serve vocation, except that vocation and job aren't the same thing and now we have confused the two and so our education is confused as well and no longer but illuminates but instead obscures. Case in point: the difficulty of claiming to support "humanism", or want to study "the humanities".
I don't see confusion so much as a desire for the two to be the same and a goal worth pursuing.
Vocation is a luxury. You gain money by serving other people's needs, not by following your vocation. It's a luxury humanity has been able to afford since only few decades (except aristocracy).
Many people in Western society feel bored, miserable and lost. That's what is behind many of these conversions to Islam. It is first and foremost, a crisis of higher purpose and if it cannot be turned to a productive output it will likely metathesize into something worse.
I don't mind people doing this at a private university, but I think it questionable that we accept this at public universities. Imagine most economic programs were taught by Moldbug about Ludwig von Mises's doctrines.