Steve Huffman: I screwed up and I want Reddit to trust me again
recode.net
recode.net
Here's what you should want:
1) Their actual safety. Not that they trust you, but that you actually don't hurt them again. This should be your top priority.
2) They feel comfortable with the amount of distance between you and them. This doesn't require them trusting you, this requires them to have agency to put up a wall between you so that they feel safe.
3) They don't trust you too much too soon. You have shown that you are dangerous to them, and so you should desire them to only trust you as far as it is safe to. If they trust you too much, that puts you in a dangerous place where both of you could get hurt again.
From there, trust can come again, at its own pace. But that's entirely up to your reliability and their comfort. You shouldn't rush it. You shouldn't agitate for it. You should just make sure #1-3 happen and then it's just a waiting game.
Having people distrust you is not something to be ashamed of. Distrust is a critical tool for safety. No matter who you are, there are lots of situations where you shouldn't be trusted. That's good. If someone is wary of you, you should be grateful. They are helping you both stay safe. You should not hope to be universally trusted. You should hope to be trusted with the responsibilities you are ready for.
If he's editing posts without permission his promise never to do so again himself is pretty meaningless. He's the CEO of a company whose staff he must hold accountable to shareholders and the public. Is he in a position to hold employees accountable for doing this in the future?
He should be replaced as CEO and take a position that while it may make business decisions clearly is barred from access to the data. Then the company should appoint a Chief Ethics Officer or Chief Integrity Officer or something whose job is to make sure things like that don't happen at any level of the organization.
This is a bigger disaster than just deleting posts outright. It's dishonest. It's disloyal to the site membership. It represents the shareholders and advertisers poorly. Just about the worst violation one can imagine on a social interaction site is to falsify another person's words.