Even if he's 100% correct I find Eric Raymond very difficult to read. His writing is evocative of that guy who gets really close to your face as he gets really excited about something you don't care about.
If you disagree with a post, do the work of explaining why.
I disagree with ESRs position because the meat of what he says are ad hominem attacks repeated ad nauseam. It's a troll in essay form and should be regarded as such.
Q: Is there any way to print an asterisk? I tried double asterisk and \asterisk to no avail. It just obliqued my text
The bottom line is that these selfish agents can form a stable cooperative equilibrium that wouldn’t be stable without the open-source commitment.
I am not sure at what point he "jumped the shark" but somewhere down the line his articles/notes started being about showing-off rather than being about substance.