Henry Heimlich has died
npr.org
npr.org
Clearly Heimlich should be known for more than the HM.
My dad (a doctor) did so once decades ago, while working in a hospital in Ghana. His patient was a man with a collapsed lung. IIRC, he took a surgeon glove, cut off the tips of two fingers, attached one to a tube, and made a knot in the wrist (so it became kind of like a balloon with two openings). The tube was attached to the lung, to drain fluid. The glove was partially submerged in a bucket of water, so it now functioned like a valve: when the patient breathed out, air and fluid could escape from the glove. When he breathed in, the suction plus water pressure would "seal off" the glove.
Holy cow, hats off to your Dad for this. Everything is simple in theory, putting it into practice on a critically ill person is something else.
http://andrewgelman.com/2016/10/09/heimlich/#comment-325017
> Truth is not only stranger than fiction, it is stranger than truth. Andrew’s next-to-last sentence links to:
> “(The Heimlich manoeuvre) has never been used in Australia. Despite the claims of the extremely charismatic Dr. Heimlich, Australian resuscitation experts believe that there isn’t enough scientific evidence to support its use. So how does a medical procedure become so widely adopted without any serious scientific evidence? — The Heimlich manoeuvre by Aviva Ziegler, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, July 27, 2009”
I'm on mobile so am not able to look it up easily, but I'm assuming there are some experiments to verify beyond anecdotes whether the maneuver works, right?
Also, what do Australians use in lieu of it?
In some areas, such as Australia, authorities believe that there is not enough scientific evidence to support the use of abdominal thrusts and their use is not recommended in first aid. Instead, chest thrusts are recommended.
Mayo Clinic: http://www.mayoclinic.org/first-aid/first-aid-choking/basics...
European Resuscitation Council: http://ercguidelines.elsevierresource.com/european-resuscita...
Australia (and New Zealand) Resuscitation Councils: http://www.nzrc.org.nz/training/ECI/anzcor-guidelines-2016-u...
In the case of Australia/New Zealand the recommendation is to do 5 Back Blows then 5 Chest Thrusts. My understanding is that it's believed to be similarly effective but has less risk of causing internal injuries.
A secretary at my workplace had a piece of pork rib stuck but there was still air getting by. An ambulance was called and the medic walked over and slapped her back to remove the food.
> Bend the person well forward and give five back blows with the heel of your hand between their shoulder blades – checking if the blockage has been removed after each blow.
> If unsuccessful, give five chest thrusts by placing one hand in the middle of their back for support and the heel of the other hand on the lower part of their breastbone – checking if the blockage has been removed after each thrust.
From https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtrea...
Note that thrusts may be used if simpler measures fail but these are chest thrusts, not abdominal as in Heimlich, and the person should be leaning forward, not held upright.
I was in a class teaching the Heimlich Maneuver yesterday afternoon. The teacher notes that Heimlich is, in fact, still alive at 96 years old. Not five minutes later someone holds up their iPhone -- "hey, I just got the craziest news alert..."
Second:
According to the same teacher, as well, some lawsuits on the part of Heimlich or his family have caused the American Heart Association to now recommend using the term "abdominal thrusts" instead of "Heimlich maneuver." Which the teacher considered sad because it would cause the name of the doctor to be forgotten over time. I'm having a hard time finding an online reference to this -- so curious if anyone else has heard something along these lines.