I use digital blocking software on my laptop now, I use bluecoat's K9 software which is an effective way to avoid thins like pornography, hate speech, and other similar content that I would prefer not to see.
I think many people feel the same way and would like a safer internet except they don't really know they have options for filtering. In churches they often promote software like covenant eyes, which is useless crap, so that tells me that the average person doesn't really know about effective filtering software.
The 20 dollar fee isn't a bad idea either. It will ensure that minors don't have free access to porn. I suspect that many parents, having the option to filter the internet for their kids, will choose to do so, I know I would. Also internet porn and certain types of internet directories are some of the biggest contributors to human trafficking, so it is only reasonable that people who use these services pay something to help government deal with some of the social problems that these services produce. Just as we have a tire tax on drivers so that those who user the roads can help pay for them, so too we can have a very small one time premium on users of porn sites to help pay for human trafficking.
Also, by sending unfiltered internet to people as default, we have created a norm for the internet filled with sexual content and hate speech. By creating a new default, and insisting on filtering as the default, we can create a new norm by which people come with a much safer internet experience.