But if the terrorists are mainly just causing fear instead of harm, doesn't it make sense to counter it by making people feel safer instead of actually making them safer, especially if you practically can't do the latter?
Food for thought...
But if the terrorists are mainly just causing fear instead of harm, doesn't it make sense to counter it by making people feel safer instead of actually making them safer, especially if you practically can't do the latter?
Food for thought...
As for the point of sense of safety vs. real safety (impossible) is a well taken one. But this false safety could be dispensed with much lower costs for the citizens (both in terms of money and inconvenience).
Or in other words, ignore concerns about profiling and implement an Israeli style security operation.
I think it has a lot to be said for it. Profiling + politeness + a firm boundary on mandate (e.g. no drug convictions by airport security) doesn't seem that bad. Especially compared to what amounts to the same thing except with a vast security army of more poorly trained agents.
Ethnically profiling selection without ethnically profiling assumption isn't a nuance I'd trust the average TSA agent to perform well.
It would be the exact opposite if 100% of the ethnically profiled individuals were terrorists.
Being brown skinned an arab or a muslim isn't what would put you on top of their threat ranking.
If we are talking about suicide bombings, I don't see how this changes anything. If they don't get through, they will just blow themselves up as soon as they get randomly selected.