Periodic table of typefaces
quicklycode.com
quicklycode.com
also I'm a little disturbed by the absence of comic sans?
I'll admit though, the rules don't seem entirely consistent to me. But they are consistent enough that I feel like there's an order here that I'm not quite grasping. I'd really like to see a post about how the table was put together, and whether the inconsistencies are arbitrary, or whether there really is a system behind it.
http://www.squidspot.com/Periodic_Table_of_Typefaces.html
Interesting: The fact that Helvetica is number one and matches up with Hydrogen's position is purely a nice coincidence.
That is what the chemists did. It took them quite a bit of work (years, iirc), and that is why we laud them. They didn't lazily appropriate some previous table's shape and force the elements to fit it. Well, hell, maybe some chemists did do that sort of cargo cult "info"graphicing. But we rightly forgot about them because what they made was silly in comparison to the actual periodic table, which conveys real information about our world.
The periodic table is about the relationships of the elements to each other. Unless typefaces have the same relationships to each other as atoms, it shouldn't look at all like the periodic table of elements.
Still, I don't think it should claim to contain "notorious" typefaces while omitting Comic Sans, Arial, Brush Script, and Papyrus. :)
Definitely analogous to Hydrogen.
i think a much better representation would be sans as metals, serifs as organics and transition from very spartan to very ornate. Helvetica and Times new roman as the top row. stuff built as postscript/pdf in the second row. not sure where to go after that.
certainly a disconnected wingding series as a separate row on the bottom.
A Knuth column would be fun.