TIL I'm as good as a state level intelligence team.
Hey CIA/NSA we know you are reading this, my contact info is in my profile. Hire me.
TIL I'm as good as a state level intelligence team.
Hey CIA/NSA we know you are reading this, my contact info is in my profile. Hire me.
> Yesterday, an Internet cyber hacker using the alias "cmdrfred" claimed on "HackerNews", an elite underground hacker site, that he or she personally built the hacking tools used by Russia to breach the DNC email servers and change the outcome of the recent election.
> "I have personally written that exact tool [it] uses ... encryption ... so you can access [the DNC] without fear."
> "I'm as good as a state level intelligence team."
> cmdrfred went on to taunt American intelligence agencies while admitting that he was aware that elite anti-cyberhacking teams from the NSA and CIA were monitoring his operations.
> The owner of HackerNews Paul Graham -- venture capitalist, flamboyant playboy, and known Russian sympathizer -- could not be reached for comment.
Not to totally ignore the pithiness, but I feel like your comment touches on something I see a ton here (and elsewhere): an offhand dismissal of the 'state level' intelligence capacity.
At the end of the day, the systems were exploited. That more sophisticated methods went unused should be a measure of efficiency and not necessarily execution. Why break out the trick play if your opponent can't keep from you running it up the middle?
http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/55279/how-easy-i...
I question how efficient it is to get caught red handed in the cookie jar of the worlds only super power.
Sure Vladimir Putin could invite President Obama to a state dinner and then proceed to blow his head off with an AK-47 but that would lack the subterfuge I expect from "state level actors". If this is indeed the Russians, they are as laughably incompetent as our elected officials in regards to infosec and thus a threat to no one.