For Australia we get our information primary from http://www.openaustralia.org.au/ — if you can give any pointers to where things are wrong, we can correct them.
For Australia we get our information primary from http://www.openaustralia.org.au/ — if you can give any pointers to where things are wrong, we can correct them.
0: http://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/Parliamentarian_S...
Secondly, in Australia the Liberal National Party is a partial merger of the Liberal and National parties. MPs in the LNP can be a member of either the Liberals or Nationals. In the House of Representatives data for Australia, the breakdown of LNP MPs between the two parties is incorrect, and leaves one MP as a sole member of the LNP. The errors are similar in the Senate data.
Additionally, two politicians (Bob Katter and Jacqui Lambie) are wrongly shown as being independents, despite being elected as the sole member of a party.
With the Liberal National Party is this a distinction between the electoral party and the parliamentary party? i.e. do people stand for election as one of Liberal or National, but then sit in a group as a single Liberal National Party? Or do they each sit as members of distinct parties which are, in turn, in coalition?
Or, from another angle, what would you expect to see within our data: a combined "Liberal National Party" for each person (with a separate field to show which party they stood for election as), or individual "Liberal Party" and "National Party" affiliations at the MP level, with the coalition shown at a party/term level?
Wikipedia shows LNP MPs as being a part of the LNP, with a note stating their affiliation.