Most of my friends who are communists are calling this "class control" and I'm laughing at them because they are getting what they wanted just without mass riots and murders of the rich.
As opposed to the great energy drink of communism?
Hardass "realists" love modeling the market as anarchic self-interested atomic agents until it comes to giving their own kids a leg-up even if they don't deserve it. Then it's all biology and social psychology.
You need to watch more DS9, Voyager, and TNG.
* Wealth redistrobution
* Basic standard of living
* Safety net
That's pretty communist in my mind. I know the purists out there will wave their hands and say "this is just an attempt of the bourgeois class in an attempt to lul the proletariat into a false sense of safety while what they are really getting is life-long survitude to their masters" because that's what my communist friends think. I think that with a rational look at this you can see it as an attempt to level a playing field in a communist fashion. Everyone starts off at a level playing field where they cant go hungry and have a basic standard of living.From the US that seems like voo-doo communist magic.
Also, I find it funny that the communist, who argues for the rights of the lower classes, is asking... I'm not going to say it. You put it best.
"You're a lot more likely to riot if your kids are starving."
Or in other terms:
"You're a lot more likely to <do what I want> if your kids are starving."
It's funny how that works out.