I think you meant this as "one can", but if it's true, you can do far more than most trained draughtsman can do and you would certainly be considered and "artist", for there is no way to do this that doesn't imbue it with your personal style. Style flows from observation and execution, or at least it should--not the other way around. At least it does in good art schools. Having a "style" is quite frowned upon for beginning students. Style is earned through dumping preconceptions and truly seeing without prejudice.
But to talk to your points, as the sibling reply points out, here drawing is being singled out as glimpse into the exploratory mind of the artist that a finished work cannot give. Its the difference between learning and knowing.
I don't think you were serious about Dali, but you should know that he was a master draughtsman, as was Picasso. These two made conscious choices to twist their hard-earned observation of the real world in ways that made them...happy?...satisfied? But make no mistake. It was all earned on the back of serious study.