Hacker News Reader

Comment by rosser | Hacker News Reader

Came here to say the same thing. How is this better than Streisand?

Both even use Ansible.

They have different objectives. Streisand's goal is to circumvent censorship, so it provisions a set of different VPN protocols (OpenVPN, LT2P/IPSEC, Shadowsocks, etc...) and instructions on how to use them, where as sovereign sets up e-mail, caldav, and other cloud related tools (which Streisand does not do).

Yeah, my question was comparing the linked project to Streisand, not Sovereign to Streisand.

This project is designed to be auditable and disposable. It does only one thing and (hopefully) does it well.

Also this project is intended to be broadly accessible to people who feel they can do the basics of managing a server.

I misread your question, my apologies. At a quick glance (and a very quick one at that), Streisand's OpenVPN setup is configured to work on both TCP and UDP ports, where as the references project is being templated from [https://github.com/Stouts/Stouts.openvpn/tree/9c83736608e4cc...]. Looking at the linked project's setup, it seems it's using outdated configurations for OpenVPN (BF-CBC instead of AES-CBC, 1024 bit keys instead of 2048) [https://github.com/Stouts/Stouts.openvpn/blob/9c83736608e4cc...]. It's also configured to log info where as Streisand tries its best not to.

I may have to fork the Stouts.openvpn role.

I also am not pleased that their easy-rsa tarball is not easily auditable rather than pulling it as a subrepository directly from OpenVPN.

edit: I have audited the easy-rsa tarball. It's still not a totally appropriate way to manage things.

easy-rsa 3 has saner defaults, especially how it configures OpenSSL, so if you fork that would be a good place to start.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com