No, but you're cherry picking very old articles, so I'm not terribly convinced. Commentary and articles as the election versus Clinton proceeded took him quite seriously.
8 Nov: There's A Wide Range Of Outcomes, And Most of Them Come Up Clinton
6 Nov: How Much Did Comey Hurt Clinton's Chances?
6 Nov: Don't Ignore the Polls – Clinton Leads, But It's A Close Race
5 Nov: Why We Don't Know How Much Sexism Is Hurting Clinton's Campaign
4 Nov: National Polls Show Clinton's Lead Stabilizing – State Polls, Not So Much
4 Nov: Trump Is Just A Normal Polling Error Behind Clinton
3 Nov: Why Clinton's Position Is Worse Than Obama's
2 Nov: The How-Full-Is-This-Glass Edition
2 Nov: Trump's Chance Of Victory Has Doubled In The Past Two Weeks
1 Nov: Yes, Donald Trump Has A Path To Victory
1 Nov: On A Scale From 1 To 10, How Much Should Democrats Panic?
31 Oct: The Odds Of A Popular Vote-Electoral College Split Are Increasing
31 Oct: Comey Or Not, Trump Continues To Narrow Gap With Clinton
27 Oct: Don't Read Too Much Into Early Voting
26 Oct: Is The Presidential Race Tightening?
24 Oct: Why Our Models Are Much More Bullish Than Others On Trump
Trump has as much chance of winning as Cubs
sli.mg is being attacked so I can only post a link you can't see !!
He was described as an "insider pundit" by the Clinton team
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/28878
From:brentbbi@webtv.net : ... I see Dan, Nate Silver and various other insider pundits saying what they are saying, I have been to enough rodeos to know that thoughts are being planted from the Obama-Clinton consultant class (not you, and you know who I mean). This is not helpful to Hillary, quite the contrary, ...
So I don't consider him objective.
> Trump has as much chance of winning as Cubs
Are you referring to this “The Cubs Have A Smaller Chance Of Winning Than Trump Does”[0]? If so, I don’t understand why you would consider such a headline to be inaccurate or not objective.
[0] https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-cubs-have-a-smaller...