"If you really believe Tillerson has absolved all of his holdings and won't benefit, I have a hotel on Columbus Circle to sell you."

Tillerson has also made a deal whereby he can't work Oil and Gas for the next 10 years.

The deal is with the State Department - are you saying the State Department is lying?

There is also specific Congressional oversight for Tillerson (which does not apply to Trump, by the way).

So enough conspiracy theories - either put up some evidence of your claim that somehow Tillerson will not sell his shares - or don't make the comment.

"Is it really "bloat" if it's giving people livelihoods and jobs?"

Wow ... Yes! The very fact that you'd leave aside government workers actual ability to be productive, and just assume that 'giving people money' is somehow a 'good thing' for governance, makes me question the premise of your rebuttal.

""School choice" is just the rhetorical term"

Except it's not. When people can take their government vouchers to the schools of their choice, this is 'choice'. Not 'defunding public schools'. You're the one making the rhetorical leap here.

"Yea they are so bent out of shape that a thin-skinned narcissist rapist wants to basically loot the country with his cronies"

Take this kind of stuff to Huffpost, you'll find like minded people there.

I don't really like Trump, but the list is not remotely unreasonable.