Your own article appears to have exactly that claim:
> These are obvious flaws in design, in my opinion, that warrant re-looking at, but to which no real improvements are being made for some reason. (Incompetence? Politics? Both? Who knows.)
> Without further ado: The standard interpreter bring rather slow; PyPy is nice, but its Python 3 support is very immature.
I used A has property P, substitute A has property Q, it's still wrong claim of him, for the very same reasons:
Python has a huge user base, if he can improve it in any of his points (I just selected one) and keep it working for the user base, please. I know he won't be able, his talk is of ignorance and provocation.
And these who develop aren't stupid or doing politics, they keep the Python working for their base, improving it as much as they can.
Says the person missing that it's an opinionated list, lol. It was more meant to provoke discussion, not hurt feelings (like your obviously seem to be).