Bomb Designer, Mars Expert Sent by Obama to Fix Oil Spill
preview.bloomberg.com
preview.bloomberg.com
They are planning to divert an asteroid and crash it into the leak.
Yeeesh. I guess it's better for that guy to be working in physical science than public policy.
> “A number of critics have asked if monogamous homosexuals are also culpable. Quite apart from the question of the definition of monogamous (sexual contact with only one person in a lifetime? serial monogamy? some cheating? etc.), I suggest the following analogy: A man joins the Ku Klux Klan. He is not violent, and would never hurt a fly; he just wants a safe place to express his racist feelings. Is he culpable for the Klan's past acts of violence? I believe that even though he is not criminally responsible for acts that occurred before he joined, he is morally culpable for joining the Klan. The Klan has blood on its hands, and anyone who joins must share the guilt. So, too, with the homosexual movement.”
Maybe that's just popular description, and in reality the junk in the junk shot is very well controlled?
I also read up on the BOPs a bit--very interesting. I would have expected a last ditch line of defense consisting of some sort of powerful spring-loaded ram with a maybe an explosive and/or mechanical trigger, so that if everything goes wrong, you can hook up a sub and yank something to clamp the stem, even with no hydraulic lines connected.
Not that the annular BOP isn't a clever design, using the well pressure against itself to clamp down tight.
I don't understand why some scientists come public with this type of negative commentary. It only reinforces the type of closed-off competitiveness that plagues academia. Sometimes I wonder what great advancements haven't been made as a direct result of the lack of collaboration and inherent selfishness within scientific fields.
Also, you left out the last part of the quote: You can’t miss that one that is brilliant.
I guess I hear those types of comments all too often in academia from scientists who are trying to make a name for themselves at the expense of others.
The much publicized 5,000 bbls/day figure is from a surface only estimate by NOAA. It's been discovered that much of the leak is forming large sub-surface slicks. One such below surface slick is 10 miles long, by 3 miles wide, by 300 feet thick.
These guys are not going to be visible til / if they come ashore.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYFYVNvgg-A&feature=playe...
Why not just get bulk carriers full of gravel and start dumping it until it's buried? Are you saying that oil can get through a million tons of gravel?
If that sounds crazy, BP itself was talking about injecting golf balls into the tube.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/may/10/deepw...
At any rate, it's not like I have any experience in this. But it's a shame to see people downvoting someone for simply offering an idea. Ah, but such is Hacker News..
The gravel idea is especially bad. That's like saying you're going to shut down an industrial fan on the floor of a arena by dropping a box of packing peanuts onto it from the ceiling.
The down-votes are people saying "Yes, it's just you. It's a hard problem. Read about it some more and you will see why." Just because it looks simple on Youtube it doesn't mean it's simple.
I don't see why you bemoan Hacker News for down-voting a comment that is effectively a waste of time. It's a slap on the wrist. That's OK. Next time, he'll read more about it and think the idea through more before commenting.
Perhaps it can't be avoided in an online forum. Perhaps it's the cost of any type of voting system that is trying to save everyone time. But it's a really good way to miss the big picture. Any revolutionary solution to any problem is going to sound wrong at first. It's just worth remembering that sometimes.
If you disagree with someone, it doesn't mean you have to downvote. This may seem like a bit of a stretch (this http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1350425 comment got me thinking about it), but there's a reason governments don't last as pure democracies. There's a reason they kill Socrates and make huge mistakes. The cognitive dissonance associated with 'mob rule' is a very terrifying thing. It's why we balance it with other branches of government, etc. Why we have constitutions, bills of rights that protect a minority's viewpoint from majority rule, in law, etc.
Hacker News, newsgroups, the internet...don't have that balance. So the responsibility is with everyone to be even more circumspect, to allow more breathing room, instead of simply reaching for the easy downmod.
Or maybe Hacker News isn't a 'classroom'. Maybe it's only for people who don't take much risk in their posts. I suppose there's some value in that. I admit though it seems less honest, interesting and helpful to me as a site for helping startups or people with a startup-like mentality.
I up-vote well reasoned comments I don't agree with. I also up-vote comments that ask questions. I ask lots of questions on Hacker News.
I would down-vote a comment that starts out dismissive of a complex problem without having a reasonable explanation.
A simple problem and a problem you don't understand will appear the same. We all do it; the Dunning–Kruger effect is a well known cognitive bias. For that reason, I appreciate a humble tone and I use the one tiny tool I have to try to encourage it.
BTW: here is the official place to give suggestions: http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/doc/2931/546759/
I bet there is huuuuge pressure behind the oil spewing out.
... except when they did that, the flow of oil pulled water into the funnel, formed methane hydrate crystals and caused the funnel to start fill-up and start floating away. They might have tried to melt the crystals but I'm guessing there a chance for them to explode or something...
So it's a messy problem - at 5,000 the behavior of every substance involved is different. Imagine trying to use a baseball mitt to staunch an open wound (or whatever metaphor for awkward futility you'd like).