"Might his lower Twitter engagement have something to do with people getting sick of hearing from him about Trump?"
Do you really think the attention he gets on Twitter DROPPED because of him talking about Trump?
Do you really think the attention he gets on Twitter DROPPED because of him talking about Trump?
Seeing him post pictures of himself acting in the role of sugar daddy to a petulant child-woman is well beyond my initial scope of interest in him.
My interest was Dilbert. It was all about making fun of the disconnect between management and employees. Ironically, his public persona is now at odds with the general theme of his work.
I suspect his original material is just the byproduct of his initial position and people emailing anecdotes to him.
I like Wagner too. But if I had to read an anti-Semitic pamphlet every time I listened to him, I wouldn't put him in my playlist.
I think that's reasonable, no?
You can see blog titles from his blog if you scroll down and read them.
Is seeing blog titles (if you choose to scroll down and then read them) like "outrage dilution" and "Should twitter and Facebook be regulated as entities" comparable to having to read an anti-Semitic pamphlet?
When I go to dilbert.com, I see a mixture of full blog entries, cartoons, and blog titles. I'm simply not entertained in his attempts at blogging.
Adams has probably gotten a bit bored pushing the same cartoon out and now conflates the value of his blog with his cartoon.
EDIT: Also compare the UX between http://dilbert.com and http://www.cad-comic.com/cad/. With CtrlAltDel, the blog is there, but you don't have to scroll by it and you can completely ignore it. With Dilbert, the blog shows up before the cartoon. It's pushed down your throat.
No, just the work of the people I'd rather not support. Some artists and I have the same views and interests.