I wonder if this is a result of Obama ordering American intelligence agencies to stir the pot. The January 26th article[1] seems to suggest that the crackdown began around the time of the U.S. election. Although, maybe the phrasing was merely intended as an editorial flourish that implies a more specific timeline than intended.

But it would make heaps of sense for Obama to make threats of future retaliation all the while plans had long already been put into motion. It would be an especially smart strategy considering that one of the dilemmas of retaliation was risking exposing American intelligence sources. And Obama participating to such an extent in the deception and distraction is not only ingenious, but probably would have been quite cathartic for him given his personal dislike of Putin.

Obviously quite speculative and perhaps wishful thinking. But Russian meddling in the election was known to the US long before the November election. Obama even said he personally spoke to Putin about it last summer, after which Obama claimed it stopped. And for all his faults, Obama is still a rather principled man as far as politicians go. Obama may have never have had any intention of letting it slide, whether or not Hillary won. And indeed, setting plans in motion before the election would have insulated Obama from some serious ethical criticism regarding his motivations. (Albeit quaint ethical criticism in our brave, new political era.)

[1] http://www.prevendra.com/russias-fsb-cybersecurity-team-impl...