Hacker News Reader

Considering it is illegal for companies to do what Trump ordered[0], I'm not sure that would be the best analogy.

She was fired for outright refusing to do her job [1], encouraging her subordinates to the same, and for going public about it.

[1] "to prosecute and conduct all suits in the Supreme Court in which the United States shall be concerned"

No, her job is to help follow the laws of the country, not to do whatever the President says. The President is not a dictator or a CEO.

The president is a CEO. He is quite literally the chief officer of the executive branch.

Though he is a CEO of a public entity. Something I'm pretty sure he has no experience with.