Obligatory (because I don't care to defend things that people like to assume): I don't like Trump and didn't vote for him partly because of the stuff that's in the news now.
Obligatory (because I don't care to defend things that people like to assume): I don't like Trump and didn't vote for him partly because of the stuff that's in the news now.
[1] http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/01/30/doomsday-prep-f...
It's clearly a response to his thoughts on the recent immigration order. But it's a long-form logical fallacy.
[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2016/10/...
My point is "it doesn't matter and I don't know why I should care". I'm more interested in rational (not fallacy-centered) responses to his thoughts.
Although there was a lot of press recently about people like Thiel buying these remote places in case of some sort of global disaster. NZ is a nice place to have a pint or two and wait for the trouble to all blow over. So it may seem like pushing for Trump could increase the risk of global disaster, which Thiel has hedged against but many of us are not as fortunate to have a well stocked, remote bolt hole.
Because it's in bad taste to want to immigrate to / get citizenship at a country, when you're deep involved into politics that affect another country.
As a side note, New Zealand has the best immigration site I've ever seen: