Living in Kiev: My first 3 months of observations
petersantenello.com
petersantenello.com
Sure it has history, and some places look really nice...but come on. Seems to be a bit of western romatiziation, but the whole country is / was about to explode (I stood in The Square during the Orange Revolution), there are no opportunities, the country is being literally, fucked, by Russia and the West on the other side as some neo-proxy war circa 1960. Oh and the corruption, corruption everywhere. Pulled over? No problem, just put a 50 in the passport and hand it over non-challantely. What seems to be problem officer?. Oh...I don't have a fire extinguisher, well look in the passport you'll definitely see it. Pensioners and the disabled are getting royaly shafted by economy, disability insurance and pensions have remained stable but the currency devalued on a rate that is almost comparable to Venezuela.
The president before the current one spent time in jail.
I know people from Kiev that have visited Canada, and are literally trying their hardest to get out before they get killed. When the power goes out at night, almost everyday they think the Russian have finally decided to bomb them.
If you're anything but white, even slightly asian looking, get ready to be called racial slurs on the streets.
Neofacism is rampant, skinheads used to roam the streets.
Half the people from my school either got hooked on drugs or alcohol before Grade 8. The AIDS epidemic literally almost swallowed the whole country. There were horrible stories as a child that I used to hear of kids in the playground playing with needles from heroin addicts and getting infected with HIV because they stabbed themselves on accident and their parents coming to the brink of suicide because of that. I also remember a story in the news when somebody put a pin upside down in a movie theatre with a bit of blood on it, and nearby a note that said "Welcome to the HIV family"... and somebody sat on it.
Not ever in my life do I want to go back to that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS_in_Ukraine#/media/Fil...
From the map it looks like Russia may have lowered the average in their behalf.
So, you got out, good for you. But things've changed. Not everything is nice, but skinheads are a fad of the past now, for example.
Not sure I'd put both Russia and the West on the same level here, Russia literally invaded and annexed parts of Ukraine. It sucks though
I assume a lot of the appeal to Westerners visiting Ukraine is they are effectively much richer than back home.
Some blame NATO expansion as "triggering" Russia, but honestly, what does Russia expect after occupying Eastern Europe for 50 years. Those Eastern European countries don't want a return to that. Harsh, autocratic Soviet policies guaranteed antagonism.
So from a geopolitical standpoint, they are kind of between a rock and a hard place. The west wants to sanction Russia and Russia wants to show it is still a formidable force as well as needs to have a deep water port in the black sea.
How come you don't spell Kyiv properly?
Both spellings are proper.
Edit - should revise somewhat. Has to do with slight differences between Russian, modern Ukrainian and older Ukrainian, as well as changes to how Ukrainian is transliterated.
The propaganda is strong in modern Ukraine - don't dare question the new pro-west narrative. Never mind the fact that Poroshenko has a lower approval rating than Yanukovych did (still can't touch Yushchenko's 3% approval rating though).
Not really, that's how it's tranliterated from Ukrainian. "Kiev" is a transliteration from Russian.
Wow, this is some Kremlin-grade propaganda here.
I can personally vouch that this is true. I traveled to Kiev in 2010 to present at the local PyCon. On the way back home to the airport my taxi was pulled over for "speeding" (he was not). The situation was resolved by an exchange of cash, no ticket necessary.
It should be known that the US isn't immune to this graft either (e.g., my aunt passed her driving test in Chicago via a conveniently placed $20 bill).
I have my doubts.
My immigration timeline is the same and since 2008 I go to Kiev every year and things do change. Some for worse, some for better, some changed for worse and then for better. I think I understand what author meant by youthful energy. It's there all right. Despite everything there are happy young faces on the streets and in parks. Funny kids in rad glasses and bow-ties (and when I was teenager sporting long hair was asking for trouble). Chasopys co-working space is abuzz with people collaborating either in person or over internet. New attractions, new places, new events. I hope this energy won't dry out.
Kiev is not as bleak as described in parent post. Life is fucked up by war but the city is worth visiting. Worth moving there too if you're on adventurous side of expat tribe.
I think you abuse the word "literally" a bit. Ukraine has had a huge problem with AIDS, and the HIV infection level at 1.3% of the whole population is horrible. That's a far cry from "literally almost swallowing the whole country" though.
> the country is being literally, fucked, by Russia and the West
> the whole country is / was about to explode
> people ... are literally trying their hardest to get out before they get killed
> When the power goes out at night, almost everyday they think the Russian have finally decided to bomb them.
and urban myths from the 90s (like the HIV needle story) included.
"slums of Kiev" might sound scary, but a lot of cities anywhere have their less interesting places. No matter what country you are from, if you want a life you will want to be out of those as soon as possible. And even then by "slums" I suppose the author meant sovietic social housing, where a lot of decent people lived and do still.
In ukrainian message boards, on news resources and youtube comment sections you can find statements of similar quality, but less thick. Those are usually left by pro-russian trolls to stir some "debate" that ends in slurs and swearing, not to say author is one.
Some points are valid like the president one, but even the best of us make mistakes by not taking an active enough stance.
To conclude, this post is not on a technical matter, but at least the author could try to keep it cool and constructive.
I traveled the world quite a bit, but never felt like relocating to any other city — sure, they are huge issues, but if you surround yourself with good people, it's wonderful to live here.
I appreciate your input overall, but you're making more than a slight exaggeration, here. Even countries with the world's highest HIV infection rates were never "almost literally swallowed" by the epidemic.
Unfortunately the stories about the needles are true.
I felt completely unprotected - there was no effective law, everyone was either scared shitless and fighting for survival -- or a thug. It felt like the thugs had complete power over "normal citizens" like myself. I was used seeing them on my way home from school on the street corners waiting for a chance to jump at a passerby and rob them. Often they would approach you and start a conversation, probing your fear. Then you can only get away without being humiliated/beaten/robbed by walking to a crowded place, maybe.
My dad, a scientist working at an institute (in the Soviet and post-Soviet system the science was done in specialized "institutes", not in universities), could barely make ends meet. That was in part because of hyperinflation (at the lowest point he was making $100-$200 per month, IIRC) and in part because of accumulating delays in salary payouts. I remember some periods of time when all we had was bread, spaghetti and potatoes. We could not even afford transport expenses for me to go to school - thankfully, the transport system was in such shambles that there were barely any inspectors in the Metros and buses, and certainly they didn't care enough to seriously try to punish me for using it for free. Lots of people did that during the worst years in the 90's.
Many were left in the cold, with no means to survive. A generation of pensioners basically died from hunger after years of struggle and humiliation. Old people begging for money in the streets were a common sight.
Everything was dirty, malfunctioning, disintegrating. Police, courts, doctors, the army - all corrupt. Army service was an absolute hell - underfunded, unoccupied, with disintegrating facilities and corrupt officers, the soldiers were at the mercy of inevitable bullies and thugs of their unit. Let me just say that the abuse was commonplace and leave it at that.
Finally, it felt like everyone hated each other. Racism and xenophobia of every kind. People just waiting to exploit your weakness.
Before leaving, I thought there would be periods of home-sickness I would have to fight. Nothing like that ever happened. I left my parents and family behind, but was reluctant to even come for a visit; only visited them once, in 1998. I often hear claims that it's all different now. But I think that's wishful thinking - the same thugs who made it hell back in 1997 are still alive and kicking. And, more importantly, so is the culture that nurtured them.
You'll be sitting there listening and everything is going fine and then a few seconds into the conversation you'll think one of you had a stroke. It's like talking to someone in English and then they instantly migrate to a thick Irish-blacksmith dialect of English or maybe even cockney. You get the basis of what they're saying but it just isnt coming through at all.
Anyway Kyiv is definetly on the list of amazing places to visit.
From a practical perspective, Ukraine is a good source of decent software developers and designers. My project probably won't happen if I didn't have our R&D team in Ukraine which allowed me to reduce development costs at least twice. Sending payments to Ukraine would require going through a bit of hassle with paperwork, but it's doable and Ukrainian developers usually know how to deal with it. Feel free to drop me a line at <hn name> (a) easymorph.com if you need some advice on it.
FWIW here in China (where I see many Ukranians arriving recently) you have a 時鐘 (shi zhong; "time bell/clock") or 鐘錶 (zhong biao; "bell/clock readout"), as well as variants such as 手錶 (shou biao; "hand display"). Semantically these center around the character 鐘 (zhong), which itself is comprised of 金 (metal) to the left, and 童 (youth/innocence/servitude) to the right. However, in history, 鐘 meant a bell (possibly specifically implying ritual striking by servant). Interestingly, in abstract discussion of time as a noun, the term becomes 時間 which literally means "time space" or "space in time".
It was never about "soft power" influence the author and other media usually talk but about a lot of people being tired of poverty, corruption, and power abuse.
It was never about "American government winning hearts" but about Russian government sending caskets to Ukrainian families. I saw many neutral folks who became pro-West because of the attack on their homeland.
The mafia-run local government (and a good chunk of the Russian-speaking population) had no problem with it, you mean.
I’m Russian, born there, grew up there. I haven’t been in Russia since 2012. And I’d rather be dead than visit Russia ever again.
Speaking of Crimea, pre-war opinion polls are available. One of them tells us only 38% of Crimea residents wanted to join Russia: http://www.km.ru/world/2012/09/14/polozhenie-russkoyazychnog...
First: did the residents of Crimea prefer to be part of Ukraine or part of Russia?
Second: should residents of a region have the right to declare independence (or annex themselves to another country) without getting permission from the government of their current country?
The US fought a bloody war 150 years ago to settle this issue (no, US states do not have the right to leave). But they followed a different policy on Kosovo.
The Russians have been happy to recognize the right of Abkhazia and Crimea to determine their own path, but didn't grant the same rights to Chechnya (or recognize the split of Kosovo from Serbia).
China, with Tibet, Taiwan, and Hong Kong on its mind, did not show any support for Crimea's move to Russia.
As long as "their own path" means being part of Russia. Had there been any political force even talking about any other path, they'd be swiftly suppressed, it's a felony in Russia to promote secession.
I would guess that it's a felony only if you promote secession from Russia. For instance, people living in Russia are playing some kind of role in the California secession movement ("Calexit") [1].
[1] http://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Advocate-s-Russi...
1) What happens to the private property owned by citizens of Ukraine? Citizens of Russia? Citizens of a random third-party country?
2) How is government property transferred? There's some obvious non-commercial real estate here (parks, beaches) as well as commercial (government buildings)? What happens to a property publicly financed by bonds (stadiums, airports, railroads) or other mechanisms?
3) How's national debt handled? Crimea historically attracted more government subsidies than the tax revenues collected, so in a sense it played quite a significant role in formation of that debt. Do certain obligations by Ukrainian government get marked as Crimean, pending the bondholders' approval? Does the working group define some pro rata share of the debt everyone agrees on? Or does Crimea gets to start with a clean slate, while Ukraine gets stuck (ha-ha!) with the bills accummulated over the decades?
Even with an amicable separation some of those issues could take years to figure out (Grexit and Brexit being good examples of complexity). Complete absence of any work in this matter shows that Russia was less interested in establishing its rule of law over Crimea and more in destabilizing its parent entity.
Kiev is indeed awesome place to visit however you should be a desperate guy to move there not being slav.
They didn't "just ask", of course. A visit by 3,000 or so "vacationing" soldiers from a certain large, neighboring country had something to do with it also.
> Crimeans just asked for the same right against Ukraine as Ukrainians asked against Russia.
Ukraine and Russia both declared independence from the USSR in the months before the USSR was officially dissolved in 1991 [1]. In Soviet times, Ukraine was not part of Russia; they were both constituent "Republics" of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, with the right to secede from the USSR, under the USSR constitution. They both exercised this right, but it is not correct that Ukraine asked for independence from Russia, since it was not part of Russia.
As for "help from western friends", President Bush in Kiev, in 1991, before Ukraine left the USSR, warned the Ukrainians against "suicidal nationalism"; he refused to meet with leaders of the pro-independence movement [2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_the_Soviet_Unio...
A lot of Iron Curtain people had a bad experiance and it's still a hot-bed of corruption but as many other things these countries being "good" or "bad" isn't black and white. They all have amazing culture, architecture, history, and people but they are "different" from western places.
I only know what I have been told from my grandparents and from friends who have the money to travel. I don't mind what I've heard but it's really up to one's self to make such a choice.
And of course Georgia: it's very easy to fly from Kyiv to Tbilisi or Kutaisi. But beware: you go there once, you'll want to come back for the rest of your life ;)
This is partly due to the male to female ratio (Ukraine = good for men, Bay Area = dismal) and partly cultural difference. Also, the status of being a developer or engineer in the Ukraine makes you a 1 percenter; in the U.S., a developer is nothing special, even considered boring.
The typical single male in the Bay Area probably doesn't even realize how bad he has it, or how much better it could be in a different place, because his life experience is based on dating in that one location.
Go there and experience it for yourself. Take a 3-month sabbatical from your work, learn a bit of Russian or Ukrainian (this will help a lot!), rent a flat, and talk to women at every opportunity. You'll find it surprisingly easy to meet and date beautiful women.
> The juxtapositions in Kiev are manifold: people are either really hard on each other or very kind, the architecture beautiful or ugly, the smiles are wide and real, or faces rigid like stone, the women hot and the guys not [...]
> My move to Kiev was more of an accident laced with the intangible—a decision rooted in a feeling and impulse over rationality or reason. I can point out the obvious: it’s a beautiful city, it’s an economical place to live, it’s in a great position to connect with the world (2 hours to Istanbul, 2 hours to Berlin), it’s adventurous, it’s a city with a rich soul, its women are beautiful, it’s real, it has human connections that run deep, it’s modest with a rich history, and so on….
Personally, I felt like the author was trying too hard to be a travel writer that romanticised what he saw.
This kind of knee-jerk, virtue-signalling comment is what has devalued the word "sexist".
By the same token you could suggest people go to South East Asia or parts of Latin America and flash your Macbook. Yes, it works, be careful what you wish for.
The calculus and game theory of dating is interesting for nerds (for many reasons) - you might find no place is miserable for meeting women when you let go of this. Even the Bay Area.
I am trying to say this with kindness: you should introspect on how you treat people.
Helping her up he saw she was model gorgeous so he swallowed hard and insisted taking her out to dinner the next night to apologize and she accepted. Turns out she was a travel guide. He ended spending the rest of the summer there and by the time he left he was engaged.
Had a dinner with them a while back and they wanted my help building a website so they could start a business giving guided tours to Americans each summer. But the war started and I never heard back from them.