EDIT: or diesel
This could actually REDUCE refill times (if the swap out is efficient enough). If temperatures could be controlled to allow it to run in an all out mode, this could be a competitive edge?
Or would this be somehow disallowed? I imagine this would be akin to swapping out the complete fuel tank in a car instead of refueling the tank, and I have no idea about racing rules.
Have you ever watched Formula 1 or NASCAR? They can fill 20 gallons of fuel in ~10 seconds. Do you really think a battery swap system could even come close to competing with that?
And most cars refuel every 14 laps, and races are about 384 laps. Totals over 5000km in 24hrs. That's a lot of batteries...
I still think this is a pipe dream with current battery tech for other reasons (weight, power density, overheating, etc.), but from a logistics standpoint it might actually be possible.
EDIT: thanks for noticing, added metric equivs. The difference was just in the sources I found reporting the units differently.
It never took off, I guess because the infrastructure never existed, and because of the aforementioned armor issues. It's too bad. I always thought battery swaps would be an ideal way to deal with the aging of these batteries. Depreciate the value of the battery based on some formula and allow people to get a newer one once their battery passes some usage threshold, seamlessly, and bill them for the upgrade.
They replace whole nose assemblies in <30sec in F1. Audi some years ago replaced the entire rear transaxle & suspension assembly at LeMans in < 5 minutes in the middle of the night, because they'd anticipated the potential need for it and done the prior engineering necessary (iirc, that car finished 2nd and their other one won).
Reliability and safety would take some real work, just like the high-speed fuel rigs previously used in F1.