Hacker News Reader

Comment by leothekim | Hacker News Reader

Scheduling is hard too. Every company has different requirements around how their scheduling works. Lots of businesses need their employees to clock-in and -out of their assigned shifts for accountability reasons, not sure if Staffjoy supported that. The shifts can have requirements too, e.g. the maintenance shift can only be scheduled for 8 and 12 hours, but nothing longer/shorter. There are usually payroll and billing implications, so adapting to an existing payroll/billing system would be an additional challenge, and not doing so would be a non-starter for lots of businesses.

If anything, the product surface area they were trying to tackle is really broad. Probably could have focused on a particular vertical and provided more value-adds.

I'm excited to see what gets open-sourced. Schedule visualizations are also hard. :-)

View on HN

That doesn't even count the heavy hitters in the space, and even MS's recent entry add ons for o365.

I do find that the exit, open-sourcing their platform, and not burning all the cash before exiting is very classy indeed.

We looked at the Microsoft tool [1]. I honestly think it's more of an upsell play for existing customer than a new customer acquisition play. The pricing is confusing and not competitive [2].

[1] https://twitter.com/transitorykris/status/820009983601295360

[2] https://products.office.com/en-US/business/compare-office-36...

I also tried a startup which was largely premised on having better scheduling, and solving obvious operational inefficiencies with competitor businesses.

In hindsight, that was dumb, because we never got to anything near the scale where the scheduling would matter.

We didn't have a better way of acquiring customers, so efficiency never came into play. Conversely, if you have enough customers, operational efficiency doesn't matter that much.

Anyway, no profound insights here... just pointing out to people that if you have a great startup idea based on using a more elaborate scheduling algorithm than your competitors (an attractive trap for programmers, no doubt), then think again.

Business execs are often taught to distinguish between cost centers and profit centers, and to focus their attention and resources on the profit centers.

Any product that's premised on making a company's cost centers (e.g. HR scheduling) marginally more efficient is going to see very slow adoption just because it's not something execs will focus on -- they have so many other priorities that are higher on the list.

Also, SMBs almost never want to convert to pay cash for anything because they are usually so cash crunched.

Yep, it totally makes sense when put in those terms.

Also, any attempt to make the cost centers more efficient (by introducing elaborate software and algorithms) will probably make them quite a bit less flexible, require higher skilled staff, etc.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com