There's an incredible amount of self-invented licenses and if there's one advice I'd like to give to all free and open source devs: Don't do this. It annoys people in Linux distros who have to decide what to do with your code, whether it's free and there almost certainly is an existing, widely used license that does what you want. Choose one of the mainstream licenses like MIT, GPL (2 or 3, whatever, we know what it means, it's fine), Apache-2 or even something like WTFPL. It's all fine, we know what it means. But don't pick three chapters of license A and one of License B to have your unique mix.
I also remember we had a LICENSE as-is, which was supposed to mean something very specific, but it had a horrible result: Many devs used it as the license dumpster: "I don't know what license it is, so I'll tag it as 'as-is'." Thanks to lots of work, mostly done by Ulrich Müller, all of that mess is now cleaned up.