ISPs ask lawmakers to kill privacy rules, and they’re happily obliging
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
> "Further, the Order would also result in consumers being bombarded
> with trivial data breach notifications. The FCC greatly expands the
> category of information for which a breach notification would be necessary,
> even if the consumer is not harmed."
Can't have those damned consumers knowing just how far we spread their data around, nor the negligence with which our partners handle their data. That just won't do.If my ISP wants to pay me in the form of a discounted price in exchange for my browsing data then I'll reconsider my position.
Could AWS, Digital Ocean, Linode, <insert other low end hosts> all be trying to? Sure, I guess? Is it really central to their business model? I think that is a bit of a stretch so I'm comfortable trusting my tunneled traffic to them.