Really? What evidence do you have to back up your impression? Why do they give you that impression?
>You mention you work in statistics, so tell me how you would approach the problem?
I'd measure first and then debate my conclusions based on that measurement - and in an area I hadn't measured - I wouldn't spout my impressions or claims - they wouldn't be useful.
Like this thing, which you said one day, not fifty-seven days, ago:
>Huh - that Twitter feed obviously is tilted towards only showing women and PoCs as engineers.
The twitter feed isn't about only women, or only PoCs. You did the measurement yourself.
You seem to still be holding onto your impressions with contrary quantified evidence in front of you. Where's the stuff that supports you?