Surely a red warning text in the textarea element where the comment will be typed out is a better idea? The quiz still doesn't eliminate the need for moderation even though it _may_ have gone some way toward reducing that need.
Surely a red warning text in the textarea element where the comment will be typed out is a better idea? The quiz still doesn't eliminate the need for moderation even though it _may_ have gone some way toward reducing that need.
It's highly likely I can recapture the thought by stepping back into the environment in which it occurred (in this case skim re-reading the article I imagine), but honestly I don't tend to comment on ephemeral sites, rather post on communities about commenting. It seems more interesting/useful
That's not just you, it's a scientifically studied effect - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-walking-throu...
This has been a problem since the dawn of the Internet, and along the way we have seen some interesting approaches at comment moderation (Slashdot is a classic example). Moderation has the potential for abuse, and as such, should be applied reasonably and transparently. That said, I can't blame anyone for searching for new ways to fight trolling and the promotion of blatant ignorance in this day and age.
The New York Times has even resorted to limiting discussions (or not rolling them out to every last article in the first place) and human moderation. It slows down discussion, and it may be subject to censorship, but it goes a long way towards helping both sides have a say in the discussion without it devolving to Youtube quality discourse.