> Nobody ever deploys kub alone in production.
Uhh, we do. And we're not alone as we work with several other companies that do. That's quite a big nobody tent.
Uhh, we do. And we're not alone as we work with several other companies that do. That's quite a big nobody tent.
Is kub core not working on spinning out built-in volume plugins out of the core to keep it smaller? Are the maintainers not recommending using third-party tools + 3PR for all major new features going forward?
It seems like my comment was misinterpreted as a criticism of kub, or a sign of ignorance. It was neither. I stand by my comment that nobody runs naked kub in production. That doesn't make it any less good, stable or useful. It just means it's not meant to be a complete product.