So all you have is that?
Let's sum it up: there is no recording of that, there are no witnesses, there has been no transcript, Schulz himself has never acknowledged it, there are no other sources where Schulz has said anything like that, ...
All you have is a sentence which is circulating in right-wing groups.
It's actually obvious that Germany in its current form exists and that Martin Schulz aims to be its next chancellor.
> All you've done is prove my point
Sure not.
> even people who work for the EU for a long time appear to have plenty of conflicting non-EU interests.
What does it have to do with Martin Schulz?