Hacker News Reader

No, but it does have to do with what authentic material they provide. There's a reason courts require "the whole truth"

What would "the whole truth" mean in this context? An explanation of how we got here, starting with the Big Bang?

More than zero disclosures focusing on the Trump campaign, rather than the Clinton campaign.

These were not just random samplings. They were cherry-picked from a huge collection and delivered with perfect timing. This is agency work, not Assange.

Also it can be explained by the simpler hypothesis of Assange not liking Clinton without bringing Russia into things.

see http://www.mediaite.com/online/julian-assange-hillary-clinto...

and similar

But it has a lot to do with the information they omit, amirite? Isn't that why they accused the panama papers of being a CIA operation without any evidence, because they wanted to give cover for the Russian establishment they cut television deals with?