Your argument is weak, and clearly you recognise that, as the to appeals to authority, and mistaken [1 8a] questioning of something as trivial as the use of quotation marks are a poor attempt to distract from the question.
So demonstrating that you didn't even read the article.
It's not due until June 2017 (how long does it take to fit a roofbox to a car?!) and then then only for pretend use in a training facility.
It's also clear from the video that the GUI is an artists impression.
Like I said "because marketing".