Hacker News Reader

Comment by Mtinie | Hacker News Reader

Immutability of names may be a perceived benefit and a feature, vs. simply poor UX.

Regulatory, perhaps?

Regulatory is a process, so if there's a process... we can correct name on a typo on our passport, why not in this case? Either the regulatory is really really stupid (we never thought of it!), or the company bought a bad system.

Amazing that in the age of git and Merkle trees it is still hard to change something plus keeping an immutable history of the changes for documentation/accountability purposes. This should be a basic requirement for any sane system nowadays.

It is how most databases, filesystems and distributed systems work, so we know how to build those things, we don't even need merkle trees.

And despite the fact that many real world problems can be better modeled with an append only log and a derived state, somehow 99% of software systems opt to store the derived state only.

Hard to imagine any situation whatever where someone's name would change so that definitely makes a lot of sense.

Marriage.

Yeah, that's what I was getting at.

Friendly suggestion: The italics didn’t help the sarcasm come across any easier.

So what do you suggest?

A trailing /s is the convention. Failing that, perhaps less subtlety? Text is poor at conveying tone.

Why don't I put a flashing red sign that says I am joking while I'm at it?

It's up to you; you're the one controlling the chances people will get the joke in your comment :P.

At this point I'm resigned to people taking even the most improbable interpretation of whatever I say if it gives them an opportunity to call me an idiot.

Much to my occasional regret, the principle of charity is far more often invoked here than adhered to.

Unfortunately, HN doesn't support blink tags.

Where can I make a feature request?

I thought it was pretty obvious and the italics made it more so.

People can be very wrong on the internet so it's hard to tell sometimes.

Also, Poe's Law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law

Don't use sarcasm on the internet (or at least not on HN), it usually ends with a bunch of responses which didn't pick up on the fact that it was sarcasm which lowers the quality of the conversation. Remember also that many HN readers are not native english speakers and are unlikely to pick up on the true meaning of a comment if you're not really clear. Even suffixes like /s are not clear IMHO (at least, I didn't know what it meant until I saw the other comment here suggesting it and I AM a native english speaker).

Jokes and such are frowned upon on HN and many people probably see sarcasm the same way, so you risk getting downvoted too.

In order to avoid adding noise (in the form of responses from people who didn't realise you weren't serious), I would suggest to refrain from sarcastic comments.

I will definitely cease using a useful rhetorical device in case a handful of people might misunderstand me.

That may be right in your culture but it is not universally true. For example in Taiwan the law allow one to change name twice[1]. I met someone whose mother was actively searching for a more lucky name before graduation (thus reducing expected paperwork).

In France too where there is some provisions to change its name. Someone in my town who was running a business did it. His family name was Hittler, which has you guess was quite heavy to handle, and change it for Hittier.

[1] http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2010/05/30/2...

It's actually not right in my culture at all; it's blindingly obviously wrong.

Of course there are a huge number of reasons why you would want to have the ability. I don't agree with the system requirements, I was trying to figure out why it may be that way.

What are you talking about?

Women usually take the surname of their husbands in western countries.

Edit: oh, sorry I thought you were being serious.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com