I know this article is really long, but I feel conflicted. On one hand, I want to satisfy the intellectual curiosity of the interested reader, and feel compelled to go into tangents into any points I deem relevant. On the other hand, it's probably better from an ethical perspective to make things short and digestible: what good is information that doesn't get understood and remembered? And it'd probably drive more traffic it was more fun to read. The Slideshow itself is an excellent example of how you can have fun learning about the science of fun.. my article is more inclusive, though. Maybe I can integrate the two perspectives?
Maybe breaking it up into multiple blog days would be appreciated? Do people like that? I personally can't stand it; when something interests me, I want to have all the information at my disposal now. And I don't like having to click through to multiple pages.