There have been many right-wing accounts banned that were much better behaved than Milo. Twitter definitely censors based on progressive American sensitivities:
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/silence-frogs-why-twitter-censoring...
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/silence-frogs-why-twitter-censoring...
Also, it did not cite a single source backing up your claims. Can you try to be a bit more specific?
To pretend there isn't a clear bias by Twitter is just being disingenuous. I say this as someone who very left on most issues, its quite depressing seeing everything descend into authoritarianism.
I appreciate your even-mindedness. Question: do you honestly not see leftism as naturally decaying into authoritarianism?
The American right loves its military industrial complex, its police crackdowns, its bank bailouts, its manifest destiny, and so on. These are not left wing institutions in creed or membership. You could ask the same question: do you not see rightism (ingroup loyalty, moral purity, respect for authority) as naturally decaying into authoritarianism?
It is weird, in a way, yes. I think, though, that when you think from each side's point of view, it makes sense that that's the case.
> The American right loves its military industrial complex, its police crackdowns, its bank bailouts, its manifest destiny, and so on. These are not left wing institutions in creed or membership.
I think you are painting with too broad a brush. There is far more nuance in what is considered "the American right" than you imply. Five minutes on the Internet and you can find people who are obviously considered "on the right" who don't agree with any of those things.
> You could ask the same question: do you not see rightism (ingroup loyalty, moral purity, respect for authority) as naturally decaying into authoritarianism?
I would ask you to more clearly define rightism, because those three things are just as prevalent on the left, if not moreso.
Respect for authority is _by definition_ authoritarian and is completely separate from the left-right axis. As for loyalty and moral purity those seem more like talking points than actual political views.
Dude, have you been on Twitter? This happens constantly and accounts aren't banned.
Everything is going great.
If you want a platform of alt-right trolls go on the_donald or 4chan.
I honestly don't care all that much about Twitter. If Twitter wants to run their website into the ground by pandering to a vocal minority, that's their business (I've never liked Twitter anyway and preferred GNU Social et al). It's just a bit frustrating when people go full Orwell and suddenly redefine "harassment" to mean "disagreement" and various other definition changes.
> If you want a platform of alt-right trolls go on the_donald or 4chan.
Ah yes, I don't like a certain group of liberals because they act in an authoritarian way and therefore I'm part of the "alt-right". That makes perfect sense.
It's tough. So, at the end of the day, Twitter doesn't want certain content on their platform. Milo was determined to be that content. Twitter didn't say he was harassing people, they were extremely vague about it.
> Ah yes, I don't like a certain group of liberals because they act in an authoritarian way and therefore I'm part of the "alt-right". That makes perfect sense.
I didn't say you were part of the alt-right: just that if you want the kind of stuff that Milo was spewing those are the places for it, not Twitter (by their own decision.)
> GNU Social
It's not like if it has "GNU" in the title it's instantly a completely-free platform.
For you to say this, you have clearly never been on Twitter.