Centaur chess has been a thing since Deep Blue.
I think the problem their future of ai stuff is having is most orgs have no idea which of their zillion problems actually needs this tech. Hopefully this will raise more awareness.
There are still positions that people evaluate correctly but computers misjudge, but those are pretty rare.
Next year: https://www.chess.com/news/view/stockfish-outlasts-nakamura-...
And computers were only getting better since then.
If I recall correctly, Nakamura used an older version of a weaker chess engine (Rybka). He also tried to force a relatively equal position (since he was behind in points anyway) which led him to lose because of risky play.
I wouldn't be surprised at all if Stockfish would lose to Stockfish + Nakamura or any of the leading chess players. These people have been using chess engines for analyses for quite a while now and certainly know their limitations.
Granted it's all conjecture since no large competitions took place, but the mere fact that no such competitions took place suggests that the outcome probably won't be pleasant for humans.
I do see your point about position evaluation though. And yes, it would be interesting to see a tournament.
It used to be the case before about 2012-2014, but now the gap is so large that a human can only make things worse.