That sort of condescension is exactly why recent elections have turned out the way they have. Shocking as it may sound, it would seem the public isn't remotely persuaded that their interests are what you say they are.
Check where trump had overwhelming support: it was mostly in areas with lots of unemployment or underemployment. The people there don't want free stuff, they want to work.
1. How are farm subsidies different from welfare payments at worse or at best the Earned Income Tax Credit?
2. How is imposing tariffs so that some people pay more than they would pay based on free market prices not "redistributive"?
3. How can the same people who say "the government doesn't create jobs", jibe with the civilian government forcing weapons and military bases that the military says it doesn't need, but it creates jobs in the US using taxpayer money?
These are the same people who don't like ObamaCare but like the ACA.....
http://www.npr.org/2017/02/11/514732211/obamacare-and-afford...
I hear this, if you'll forgive me, rather tone-deaf refrain a lot from people who are highly educated. Practically speaking, 1) The older you are, the harder it is to retrain and then restart your career and 2) a lot of people just plain aren't education-oriented in the first place, to put it politely, and won't benefit much from retraining no matter how hard you try.
Education might be a partial solution for future generations but it will do nothing for the people who are suffering right now. And they know it.
- Bring back the public interest requirements for broadcast licenses to shut down the right wing crazy on the airwaves.
- Restrict ownership of media outlets.
- Require that election districts overlap with contiguous existing geographically defined areas. Assign designation of districts to an independent commission and make it a crime for a political official to interfere with the commission.