Funny enough is that people were mocking the concept when it was being done in the 1960's by Hansen et al. Given what they produced, maybe the critics should've thought there might be some merit to the idea.
http://brinch-hansen.net/papers/
In "The invention of concurrent programming," Hansen writes: "...Alan Perlis noticed that Regnecentralen's compiler group discussed programming problems by writing Algol 60 statements on a blackboard. This was unusual at a time when systems programs were still being written in assembly language."
So, they thought it was weird they weren't just hammering out ASM instead of high-level code. Some call you "regressive" for using pen-and-paper instead of IDE's. The prior work improved the compiler group's effectiveness at getting code correct. If you're similarly benefiting, then keep it up. I'd only say change if it's hurting your productivity in a project or professional role where you want higher productivity. If it's just fun or not fast paced, have at it.