Show HN: Gopher Browser for Windows Client
jaruzel.com
jaruzel.com
The last big thread on Gopher here was pretty entertaining, nostalgic, and informative [2] -- including posts by the creators -- and it's the one where OP posted that they're working on a new windows client [1].
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12274235 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12269784
Works great.
I'm not a fan of Open Sourcing my own code, due to bad experiences in the past, sorry.
I'm not trying to change your mind, but I'm curious about your bad experiences.
That argument has never held water for me... I'm not saying you are malicious, not at all. But if someone did want to release malware, it isn't impossible to create a fake persona, put up fake contact info, or impersonate someone. Or even hack someone else's site to put up a corrupted download. Admittedly, this one smells pretty safe... but it is even safer to just set a rule for oneself not to download executables off the web.
I respect your right to code and deliver it how you see fit. I just also respect other people's decisions to not download it for security concerns.
I'm also not a fake persona. Or if I am - I've been playing the long game since before the year 2000...
* map backspace and arrow-left to previous page
* map enter/return to select
* open text files, images and sounds inline
Nice try Google
I don't understand what you mean here. How can aggregate long download stats exist without aggregation?
Kind of like putting a warning sign at the swamp without poking for alligators (or yodas)
The warning is about download frequency of a particular file, not filetype.
SetHandler is used if you want to register GopherBrowser as the handler for gopher:// links - it adds some values and keys to the Classes_Root registry hive, which is probably why it's being flagged as a false positive by only 1 out of 61 AntiVirus products.
Rescan just GopherBrowser.exe and it will be clean.
If SetHandler.exe worries you, just delete it.
Instead of just posting 'hmm' and trying to discredit my work, how about you actually ask why it flagged, or better yet do proper analysis on the files and comment accordingly.
I run a clean ship, there is no way I'd release virus-laden software with or without my name on it.